On this day in queerstory: seeds of change in the UK and Canada
By Sofia | Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026
On January 18, 1967, Canada’s House of Commons resumed debate on criminal law reform that would eventually decriminalise homosexual acts between consenting adults. While the famous phrase “the state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation” would come later, January 18 marked a crucial return to parliamentary discussion after delays and opposition attempts to stall progress. The timing mattered. Early-year debate ensured reform stayed alive before political momentum could dissipate, and it set the stage for legislative change in 1969.
In the United Kingdom on January 18, 1980, LGBTQ+ rights groups submitted formal objections to police practices targeting queer pubs and clubs, particularly in London and Manchester. These submissions followed a series of raids conducted under public order and licensing laws. While homosexuality had been partially decriminalised more than a decade earlier, January 18 made clear that legality did not equal safety. The complaints contributed to growing scrutiny of police behaviour and helped build pressure that would later reshape relations between law enforcement and queer communities.
Across the Atlantic, January 18, 1988, fell in the thick of the AIDS crisis in the United States. On that date, ACT UP chapters coordinated protests and policy demands targeting federal agencies for their slow response to the epidemic. While larger demonstrations would dominate headlines later that year, January 18 actions focused on bureaucratic bottlenecks—drug approval timelines, exclusion from clinical trials, and discriminatory insurance practices. It was activism sharpened by spreadsheets and rage in equal measure.
In Germany on January 18, 1994, legal experts and LGBTQ+ organisations gathered to mark the effective end of Paragraph 175, the law that had criminalised sex between men for over a century. Although reforms had begun earlier, January 18 was used for public legal education events explaining what repeal actually meant for convictions, records, and compensation. Thousands of men had been prosecuted under the law, and this moment made clear that repeal was only the beginning of reckoning.
Further south, January 18, 2001, became a quiet but significant date in Chile, where advocacy groups submitted documentation challenging the military’s continued discrimination against gay and lesbian service members. While homosexuality had been decriminalised only two years earlier, the armed forces remained resistant. The January 18 submissions ensured the issue entered the annual legislative cycle, contributing to gradual reforms that unfolded over the following decade.
In Nepal on January 18, 2007, LGBTQ+ activists used the reopening of courts after the New Year to push forward cases demanding constitutional recognition of sexual and gender minorities. These early-year legal actions fed into the landmark Supreme Court ruling later that year affirming LGBTQ+ rights and calling for protections that would make Nepal one of South Asia’s most progressive countries on queer issues.
More recently, January 18, 2019, saw coordinated releases of data on anti-LGBTQ+ violence across parts of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, timed to coincide with international diplomatic meetings and funding reviews. The reports were used by human rights organisations to challenge government narratives and by asylum advocates to support claims from queer refugees. January 18, once again, became a day when documentation itself was a form of resistance.
What links these moments isn’t drama or spectacle. It’s strategy. January 18 is the day queer history shows up early, sober enough to argue clearly, and armed with enough evidence to make denial inconvenient. It’s when activism slips into legislative calendars, court schedules, and policy briefings—right where it tends to do the most lasting damage to inequality.