On this day in queerstory: Abraham Lincoln is born
By Sofia | Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026
On February 12, 1809, Abraham Lincoln was born in Kentucky. While Lincoln himself does not belong neatly in any modern sexual category, his intimate and well-documented relationships with men such as Joshua Speed have long occupied queer historical scholarship. Their shared bed over several years was unremarkable by 19th-century standards, yet the emotional language in Lincoln’s correspondence has made his private life a sustained site of queer inquiry. February 12 thus anchors one of the longest-running debates about intimacy, masculinity, and the anachronistic limits of sexual labels in historical analysis.
State repression surfaces again on February 12, 1952, when police in several U.S. cities intensified enforcement against suspected homosexual activity as part of broader Cold War “security” campaigns. Arrest records and internal memos from this period framed queer people as morally and politically suspect, linking sexuality to disloyalty. February 12 appears in municipal and federal archives as another routine day when queerness was treated as a risk to the state.
Organising continued quietly beneath that pressure. On February 12, 1963, homophile groups in California and New York circulated newsletters focused on legal literacy, member safety, and media strategy. These publications—carefully worded and deliberately restrained—show a movement working within narrow margins, long before public protest became viable. February 12 shows up here as part of the slow infrastructure-building that made later liberation movements possible.
In the United Kingdom, February 12, 1976, appears in parliamentary correspondence tied to debates over employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. Trade unions and advocacy groups submitted evidence documenting dismissals and blacklisting of gay and lesbian workers. While protections were still years away, early-February filings forced labour and equality committees to acknowledge that sexuality already shaped economic survival.
Trans history enters the archive on February 12, 1981, when advocacy groups in West Germany submitted critiques of medical protocols governing gender transition. These documents challenged compulsory psychiatric diagnosis and the framing of trans identity as pathology, pushing instead for recognition rooted in self-identification. February 12 appears in meeting notes as part of the early push that would later influence constitutional challenges.
The AIDS crisis marks the date again on February 12, 1987, when activist organisations in the United States and Europe submitted coordinated complaints to health authorities over drug trial delays and exclusionary eligibility criteria. These filings—technical, urgent, and often ignored at first—forced institutions to confront how bias determined who gained access to experimental treatment. February 12 sits among the dates where activism took the form of paperwork rather than protest.
Cultural history registers sharply on February 12, 1993, when James Baldwin died in France. Baldwin, openly gay and fiercely critical of American racism and sexual hypocrisy, reshaped how sexuality, race, and power could be written together. His death prompted global reassessment of his work, pushing queer Black voices further into literary and political canons that had long resisted them.
Legal pressure resurfaces in Eastern Europe on February 12, 2004, when LGBTQ+ organisations submitted complaints to European institutions over bans on pride marches and public assemblies. Local authorities framed these bans as public-order concerns; activists reframed them as violations of free expression and assembly. Filing early in the year ensured the issue entered legal review cycles before visibility could be suppressed again.
Education policy appears again on February 12, 2015, when LGBTQ+ organisations in Ireland and Spain submitted responses to curriculum reforms, demanding inclusive sex and relationship education. These documents tied institutional silence to bullying, mental health outcomes, and public health risk, forcing ministries to address queerness not as optional content but as lived reality.
February 12 also recurs as a date used for LGBTQ+ History Month programming in the UK, particularly for events focused on queer writers, labour history, and legal struggle. Archives show the date hosting readings, panels, and workshops rather than celebrations—spaces where history is treated as evidence, not nostalgia.
Across centuries and borders, February 12 reads as a day of argument rather than announcement. Lives examined after the fact. Laws challenged in draft form. Culture reassessed through loss. Queer history here survives not through myth, but through letters, files, submissions, and texts that refused to stay buried.