On this day in queerstory: Fighting for equality in Australia

January 26 shows up in queer history as a day of collision—between visibility and repression, recognition and refusal. It’s a date that repeatedly lands in moments where states, courts, and institutions are forced to react to queer lives already in motion.

On January 26, 1973, the American Psychiatric Association formally adopted its decision to remove homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), following the vote taken the previous month. January 26 marked the point at which the change became operational within professional and clinical settings. The shift dismantled one of the most powerful medical justifications for discrimination, conversion therapies, and forced institutionalisation, with effects rippling far beyond the United States into global psychiatric practice.

In Australia on January 26, 1984, LGBTQ+ activists used the national holiday to stage coordinated protests highlighting the gap between legal reform and lived reality. While some states had decriminalised homosexuality, policing practices and employment discrimination remained widespread. January 26 actions deliberately reframed “national values” to include queer lives, a tactic that would be repeated throughout the late 1980s and 1990s.

On January 26, 1994, the European Parliament debated resolutions addressing discrimination based on sexual orientation, following reports of police violence and censorship in several member states. Though non-binding, the debate marked one of the first times queer rights were discussed as a pan-European human rights issue rather than a domestic concern. The proceedings would later be cited in legal arguments and policy proposals across the continent.

In India on January 26, 2001, Republic Day celebrations unfolded under a legal regime that still criminalised same-sex intimacy. That year, LGBTQ+ groups used the date to circulate constitutional arguments challenging Section 377, explicitly linking queer rights to constitutional promises of equality and dignity. These arguments fed into the legal strategies that would later dismantle the law.

January 26 also appears in the history of queer migration and asylum. On January 26, 2006, advocacy organisations in Canada and Western Europe submitted coordinated documentation highlighting the persecution of LGBTQ+ people in several African and Middle Eastern countries. The timing aligned with annual immigration policy reviews, ensuring that sexual orientation and gender identity were explicitly considered in asylum determinations.

In Argentina on January 26, 2010, legal briefs supporting marriage equality were submitted to appellate courts as lawmakers prepared for decisive debates later that year. The filings focused on constitutional equality rather than cultural tradition, narrowing the legal questions courts would be forced to answer. Marriage equality would pass nationally in July, making Argentina the first country in Latin America to do so.

More recently, on January 26, 2018, LGBTQ+ organisations across Eastern Europe released detailed reports documenting bans on public assemblies, arrests of activists, and state-sponsored harassment. The reports were timed to coincide with international human rights monitoring cycles and were later referenced by European courts and UN bodies.

January 26 appears again and again as a pressure point. Medical authority is stripped of its power to pathologise. Constitutional language is reclaimed. Courts are handed arguments they can’t easily sidestep. It’s a date when queer history advances not through celebration, but through confrontation—forcing institutions to respond to realities they no longer control.Top of Form

Bottom of Form